JOB CREATION AND JOB KEEPING ®

THE ARCH PRINCE IKPE UNO

Other questions asked is that of how credible my equities are, besides the matter that is born of claims I commandeer other people’s businesses because I am the most daring idiot in the world, by incredibly stupid and insolent money mad girls and men who have access to media and always like to compare themselves to me with respect to my property on the platform of their insolent rebellious modernity; the fact being rather that no property of this Firm belongs to another, what is being confused is the obligation I have to provide negative equity securitisation in a condition where the recession has created a process where Political authority interfere with and manages the National economy, which in effect means that what becomes of the economy is no longer determined by market but by administrative authority, thereby creating a situation where any business or enterprise located in this economy is run ultimately by Political leaders by and large where the buck stops; hence for running peoples businesses for them, I had to provide the service such that it must be made worthwhile to afford them free securitisation of their negative equities, so that Politicians can justify, first of all getting them to co-operate and run the businesses effectively under government supervision during the crisis and also the process of demanding the creation of jobs, by which the Politicians get rewarded for their jobs when the electorate is happy with their performance. I should therefore compare it for this purpose to a 2-kilometre marathon; where I aim to raise £2,000, which means I am selling each metre for a pound. What I must do is run it and maybe make a video of myself and then go around raising funds from those in whose interest I ran it, so I must have worn the vest with their logos on it and so on and must have made a video to make that happen but if somebody else did so with a replica vest and went off to get the money because he has media, some might still give me some money when I authenticate my identity later but some will not, however if that process where it happens carries on over and over and over, at a point, they will know who it is that does it and will tell them they know who they are but because such have media, they will bully them until they give the money, which means they give it to them because they expect the owner to do something about it and it will go on like this until it becomes institutional if nothing is done about it. Not to mention the fact that if I set out securities, an example of which is the one I have mentioned here i.e. for example a piece involving a process of setting out information about fundamentalisms of the far right, so they see less reasons to make enemies and hurt people and somebody wants to create a Car on that, bids for it and takes it, after which I have to go to my sites to confirm, or the kind where white boys will see me isolate them and set about peddling that stupid culture so that my office might be respected and the blacks will see me cut them off from the left and become the worst thing that ever happened to their sense of justice in this country and or the world over, which I will set out to package for example and then trade them away in the same form, when somebody has his wealth distribution plans in the circumstances, he completely ruins that for me too after the intrusion and vandalism. So, the idea I steal their culture has no bases on reality, it is one of the matters by which I can very pragmatically show them how many products have been created with their cultures, so they can hate my guts with it. As for their women, they always really, really love me whenever I have difficult work to do and then will get media idiots to gather the income based equities for them as well, while they turn up on TV to show their faces and do what they can to make me angry enough to spill some sex (as they put it), about which it soon becomes a matter of how I speak to people because it helps me manage my mind claimed to be the case by them, which has nothing to do with reality that rather operates on the fact I always do so to return their filth back to them as I will only be possessed when they no longer work on media but I need to look after myself until then, each time they toss it at me and the camera man does things for them so they can have a certain kind of sex and have access to the Kingdom of God without repentance, by which they will turn up the day after to introduce themselves on National TV and get it back. They ask whether I understand what people are actually saying to me and I find it bewildering that people will think I don’t understand what people mean when somebody is the sole bread winner in the family, has a good job and starts to tell his wife about buying their home and in 4 months loses the job because of the recession, about which I ran around the place spending my own property to create equities and securities to make businesses profitable again so that they can employ but they cannot buy the books to confirm what I did is a good thing because they rather prefer that accolade to go to drug lords and Popular culture idiots and thereof claim to have control of my finances, by which they can ensure I do what they want, bearing in mind I promised to create people jobs and they are here to ensure that is precisely what I do with myself. The question is whether they are harming me or themselves, since businesses on the other hand not only see them do these things to create expensive security questions on and or about investments i.e. somebody sells equities and securities meant to ensure I am profitable and therefore employ them but they say it is a bad thing and therefore my right to invest but also to employ them, bearing in mind it is a centre stage, made up so they can play junior sibling that has access to the money, while I become senior sibling that knows what must be done and is therefore ruled by the richer junior who is one of the world worst envy freaks and more so because there are campaigns of wealth distribution in town as well by which facts and truths and ownership can be subverted. I was only referring to my problem earlier on i.e., that I have got a wife and kids and a mortgage is not criteria for an entitlement to jobs. With respect to politicians, every time I say something about being forced to own over 90% of the planets economic intellectual property it gets to mean the right to take hold of and split all I own among themselves which is what the unauthorised handling of my property was all about in the first place; however based on the above two prognosis of which it is clear the method they are pushing me into deploying against government operatives of a certain kind.

I. Uno I

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland